Advanced tools for framing constitutional arguments and developing persuasive legal strategies.
Frame your constitutional arguments for maximum persuasive impact across different judicial philosophies.
Historical meaning and Founding Era intent
Plain meaning of constitutional text
Real-world consequences and practical outcomes
Tailor your arguments to specific justices' judicial philosophies and concerns.
Focus on securing Roberts and Barrett while providing cross-ideological appeals for liberal justices.
Analyze relevant precedents and their application to your case.
Track the persuasive strength of different argument strategies.
Lead with historical religious liberty arguments emphasizing Pennsylvania's colonial experience.
Frame as abstention claim rather than accommodation demand to appeal to liberal justices.
Argue narrow application to insular communities if broad religious liberty fails.